Last updated: 4 July 2014
The Francis Inquiry report was published one year ago on 6 February 2013 and examined the causes of the failings in care at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust between 2005-2009. The report makes 290 recommendations, including:
On 24 June, the Secretary of State for Health, Jeremy Hunt, launched a new campaign called Sign up to Safety. The campaign forms part of the response to the Berwick Report. You can read the Health Foundation’s response here.
The campaign has a three-year objective to save 6,000 lives and halve avoidable harm. Organisations and individuals can sign up to safety and make pledges to improve patient safety. Organisations are being asked to set out how they will take action to improve safety and reduce harm.
NHS England, Department of Health, Monitor, NHS Trust Development Authority, NHS Litigation Authority and CQC have all commitmented to align their organisations’ work with the campaign, which will be led by Sir David Dalton, Chief Executive of Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust. David is also a Health Foundation Governor.
More information is available on the NHS England website.
The government has now responded to the recommendations of the Francis Inquiry in Hard Truths: the journey to putting patients first. It includes recommendations for improving patient involvement in their care, increased transparency, changes to regulation and inspection. Read our press release on the government's response.
In its response, the government also responds the Health Select Committee report After Francis: making a difference and to the findings of the six review groups which were set up to explore some of the issues the Francis Inquiry report raised. The review groups reports are available here:
Following the Report of the Francis Inquiry and the Berwick Review into Patient Safety, NICE has been asked by the Department of Health and NHS England to produce guidelines on safe staffing capacity and capability in the NHS. During May 2014, NICE consulted on staffing levels in acute care and in A&E. More information is available on the NICE website.
The Nuffield Trust have published a research report called 'The Francis Report: One year on'. The report looks at how hospitals have responded to the findings and recommendations contained in Robert Francis QC’s report.
It found that many of the themes from the Francis Inquiry Report, including the importance of openness, adequate staffing levels and patient-centred culture, have resonated with leaders of the hospitals. However, the research also found that some hospital boards were finding it hard to meet increased demands for assurance and scrutiny from external regulators and commissioners that have arisen since the Francis Report.
The National Quality Board (NQB) - which brings together the different parts of the NHS system with responsibilities for quality, alongside patients and experts - published a 'Human Factors in Healthcare Concordat' signed by its member organisations and other partners on 19 November 2013. The Concordat can be found on the NHS England website.
In October 2013, the GMC published update on their progress against the recommendations of the Francis report. The work is focused around six main themes:
The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) has set out its commitment to a series of actions to help realise the recommendations of the Mid-Staffordshire inquiry in their response to the Francis Inquiry.
In this briefing, we reflect on the factors that have contributed to the success of Virginia Mason Medical Centre in the US, and how a similar approach has been used in the UK. It aims to help those working to improve patient safety in the NHS.
In the light of 'Hard Truths', the government's formal response to the Francis Inquiry, we ask how the NHS should digest and translate the learning and recommendations to create a safer and more compassionate place for the patients it serves. Read our briefing.
In the last decade in the UK there has been a huge volume of data on medical error and harm to patients collected. Despite this, we still don’t know how safe care really is today.
During 2013 we worked with stakeholders to develop a framework about how we can measure and monitor patient safety so we can find the answer to this elusive question 'How safe is care today?'. The framework is proposed by Charles Vincent and colleagues from Imperial College London in their report The measurement and monitoring of safety. We have also developed a practical guide for the measurement and monitoring of safety.
At the moment, safety management tends to be reactive and to focus on areas that are easy to measure. This means improvements have focused on reducing specific healthcare associated harms, such as MRSA, and improvements have only been made after a number of people have experienced poor care.
To improve safety further, a more proactive approach is needed – identifying where things could go wrong and taking action to prevent this happening. Through our improvement programmes we are testing and developing ways to support proactive approaches to managing safety.
We have a number of ongoing improvement programmes and projects that explore the themes likely to be raised by the Francis Inquiry. These will report results over the next two years.