Unfortunately, your browser is too old to work on this website. Please upgrade your browser
Skip to main content

Title

Explaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement Programme

Authors

Mary Dixon-Woods, Charles l. Bosk, Emma Louise Aveling, Christine A. Goeschel, Peter J. Pronovost

Published journal

The Millbank Quarterly

Abstract

Context: 
Understanding how and why programs work—not simply whether they work—is crucial. Good theory is indispensable to advancing the science of improvement. We argue for the usefulness of ex post theorization of programs.

Methods: 
We propose an approach, located within the broad family of theory-oriented methods, for developing ex post theories of interventional programs. We use this approach to develop an ex post theory of the Michigan Intensive Care Unit (ICU) project, which attracted international attention by successfully reducing rates of central venous catheter bloodstream infections (CVC-BSIs). The procedure used to develop the ex post theory was (1) identify program leaders’ initial theory of change and learning from running the program; (2) enhance this with new information in the form of theoretical contributions from social scientists; (3) synthesize prior and new information to produce an updated theory.

Findings: 
The Michigan project achieved its effects by (1) generating isomorphic pressures for ICUs to join the program and conform to its requirements; (2) creating a densely networked community with strong horizontal links that exerted normative pressures on members; (3) reframing CVC-BSIs as a social problem and addressing it through a professional movement combining “grassroots” features with a vertically integrating program structure; (4) using several interventions that functioned in different ways to shape a culture of commitment to doing better in practice; (5) harnessing data on infection rates as a disciplinary force; and (6) using “hard edges.”

Conclusions: 
Updating program theory in the light of experience from program implementation is essential to improving programs’ generalizability and transferability, although it is not a substitute for concurrent evaluative fieldwork. Future iterations of programs based on the Michigan project, and improvement science more generally, may benefit from the updated theory present here.

You might also like...

Citation

Dixon-Woods, M., Bosk, C. L., Aveling, E. L., Goeschel, C. A. and Pronovost, P. J. (2011), Explaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement Program. Milbank Quarterly, 89: 167–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00625.x
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more