Unfortunately, your browser is too old to work on this website. Please upgrade your browser
Skip to main content

New report calls for more support for hospitals and GP practices, as well as extra funding, to secure the future of the NHS in England

16 September 2014

About 3 mins to read

A new report launched today (Tuesday 16 September) by the Health Foundation argues for more support for providers of NHS care in England to ensure quality of care for patients does not deteriorate.

It is projected that by 2021 there will be a £30bn gap between the budget for the NHS in England and what it actually needs to deliver services.  Up until now, the financial squeeze has not impacted on overall quality of care for patients, as measured by national indicators. But with 60 Trusts now in the red, the cracks are starting to appear. Quality of care is deteriorating in some key areas such as mental health, 18-week waiting times and cancer waits. Ignoring these challenges risks an avoidable crisis in the NHS in the months and years to come.

To tackle these challenges, More than money: closing the NHS quality gapadvocates that significant changes to services should be accelerated to improve and maintain quality – more coordinated care across different settings, more care provided outside of hospitals, and a greater role for patients through self-management and shared decision making. The complexity of these changes means they will take time and require sustained support – managerial, clinical, financial and political – across the NHS.

The report also argues that while extra money is needed for the NHS both in the short term (a transformation fund) and on an ongoing basis, money alone will not be enough to provide a comprehensive NHS that delivers care to existing levels of quality.

Richard Taunt Director of Policy at the Health Foundation, and lead author of the report, says: 'As our report shows, a debate is needed about how the NHS can best be supported to become more efficient and consistently provide high quality care. There is a risk that discussions around whether the NHS should be funded by the public or private purse become a dangerous distraction, at a time when the collective attention of the health service needs to be on how to deliver consistent and high quality care.'

The report outlines three ways that this sorely needed change can be supported within the NHS:

  • Systematic improvement support for providers: The key organisations within the health care system should support providers of care in implementing improvements to services, both within their own organisation and working with other providers to deliver integrated care. Such support might include building skills in basic management, change management, improvement skills and analysis, all with the objective of improving quality and efficiency. 
  • Targeted resources: Two types of funding are needed: first a “transformation fund” to allow new services to be introduced and existing services to be improved; and second, as the financial gap cannot be closed by productivity alone, ongoing additional funding. 
  • Political openness and support for change: Political support is critical for the changes needed both in the short and medium term. A start would be a new candid dialogue between politicians and both the public and NHS about the challenges, and why significant change is needed now. 

Media contact

Mike Findlay, Media Manager
T: 020 7257 8047
E: mike.findlay@health.org.uk

Note to editors

More than money: closing the NHS quality gap is the result of research undertaken by the Health Foundation. It is partly underpinned by a joint workshop with the Foundation Trust Network which included senior representatives of 25 NHS and foundation trusts – acute, mental health, community, and ambulance – to explore the likely effects of the financial gap on the quality of care they provide. 

In addition the report draws on a scan of the available evidence on how six other countries (Portugal, Ireland, Denmark, Canada, Spain and the Netherlands) have dealt with austerity, focussing on what the most common policy responses were to financial pressures, which is available in a separate document: International responses to austerity.

You might also like...

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more