Delivering a national approach to patient flow in Wales Learning from the 1000 Lives Improvement Patient Flow Programme
September 2017

Key points
- The programme resulted in pockets of improvement across six local health boards. The most sustained improvement was achieved across one local health board. It ensured that local ownership and commitment to its pre-existing work on patient flow was maintained and used the national programme as further support.
- There was a mismatch between the programme’s ambitions and its design, timescale and resources. A two-year time scale was not sufficient to achieve change at system level and the programme didn’t have the resources required for such a large-scale initiative.
- There was significant variation in programme engagement and leadership support across local health boards. Some local health boards experienced a lack of clarity on responsibility for leading, reporting on and owning the programme and local projects.
- Many of the projects were not clearly aligned with the strategic objectives of the local health boards. This meant it was difficult to secure the necessary support from management at every level to deliver sustained results.
- For a national programme, local ownership of projects needs to be balanced with clear national programme coordination, focused on achieving the overarching goal that is aligned with national policy.
This report summarises the findings of the independent evaluation of the 1000 Lives Improvement Patient Flow programme. The programme was implemented between 2013 and 2015.
The report highlights the challenges of delivering a national programme aimed at improving the flow of unscheduled care of patients. Overall there were some positive results achieved but the programme activities were not implemented at the scale and pace originally envisaged.
The programme evaluation was commissioned by the Health Foundation and carried out by the Centre for Systems Studies at Hull University Business School. The programme was led by 1000 Lives Improvement.
Further reading
Learning report
The challenge and potential of whole system flow
Outlines an organising framework and tested methods that local health and social care leaders can...
Learning report
Improving patient flow
This learning report describes the work undertaken by two NHS trusts as part of the Health...
You might also like...
Event
The International Forum on Quality and Safety in Health care 2022
The Health Foundation have a number of speaking sessions at the International Forum on Quality and...
Journal article
A multicentre evaluation exploring the impact of an integrated health and social care intervention for the caregivers of ICU survivors
The impact of an integrated health and social care intervention for the caregivers of ICU survivors.
Journal article
Linkage of National Congenital Heart Disease Audit data to hospital, critical care and mortality national data sets to enable research focused on quality improvement
Quality improvement of critical care usung congential heart disease audit data.
Get social
Health Foundation @HealthFdn
A healthy place doesn’t build itself. We all have a part to play in putting the right blocks in place. Visit us a… https://t.co/6PvhUXhm4Q
Follow us on TwitterWork with us
We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.
View current vacanciesThe Q community
Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.
Find out more