Unfortunately, your browser is too old to work on this website. Please upgrade your browser
Skip to main content
  • 28% of private renters in non-decent homes rate their health as less than good, compared with 22% living in decent homes.

This chart shows the proportion of those rating their health as less than good (on a range of very good, good, fair, bad or very bad) by tenure and whether they live in a non-decent or decent home.

Non-decent homes are those with a hazard of immediate threat to a person’s health, not in a reasonable state of repair, lacking modern facilities or not effectively insulated or heated.

People living in non-decent homes are more likely to report less than good health than those living in decent homes in the private rented sector (28% and 22%, respectively) or if they own their own home (18% and 15%, respectively). In contrast, those living in decent homes in the social rented sector appear to have poorer self-rated health than those in non-decent homes, although the difference is not statistically significant. This may reflect the greater likelihood of decent homes in the social rented sector and how homes are allocated: poor health is one of the criteria for priority access to social housing.

Non-decent homes can potentially affect health in several ways. For example, Category 1 hazards – as assessed by the Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS) – such as tripping risks can cause injury, whereas poorly insulated homes can contribute to a cold environment. When looking at health by tenure, it is important to note that causality can run both ways: people with poorer health may have worse employment outcomes, leading to less income to acquire good quality housing.

The association between poor health and non-decent homes is highest in the private rented sector, which also has the highest proportion of non-decent homes. Progress in improving the standards of homes has stalled in recent years, highlighting the need for renewed policy attention.

  • Non-decent homes have been defined by the Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government as homes with a Category 1 hazard – as assessed by the Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS) – that are not in a reasonable state of repair, lack reasonably modern facilities or do not provide a reasonable degree of thermal comfort. 
  • Less than good self-rated health is defined as those who rate their health as fair, bad or very bad.

Source: Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, English Housing Survey. Data are for 2013/14.

Related analysis

Related long read

Explore the topics

Local authority dashboard
Explore data for your local authority and neighbourhood

Health inequalities

Money and resources
Poverty | Income | Debt

Quality | Unemployment | Security

Affordability | Quality | Stability | Security

Active travel | Social exclusion | Trends

Family, friends and community
Personal relationships | Community cohesion

Our surroundings
Pollution | Green space | Safety | Amenities

Coming soon

This is part of Evidence hub: What drives health inequalities?

Data, insights and analysis exploring how the circumstances in which we live shape our health
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more