• This project was run by Cardiff and Vale University Health Board.
  • It was run by the head and neck cancer team in Cardiff.
  • The team set out to enable patients to take part in active decision making through the use of decision support tools.
  • They agreed priority areas, appointed clinical experts, and developed draft option grids to share with patients for feedback.

Patients who use decision support tools have been shown to be more informed and able to take part in active decision making. Cardiff’s head and neck cancer team were particularly interested in using decision support tools. When they found none were suitable for their needs they decided to develop their own. 

They created ‘option grids’ – brief list-based tools, designed for clinical encounters. Information about the key features, benefits and risks of treatments, and questions for patients, are organised in a table for rapid access and comparison.

The team met and agreed three priority areas: early cancer of the tonsil, early cancer of the vocal cords and cancer of the voice box.

A clinical editor was appointed for each area, and small groups of clinical experts from surgery and oncology formed to collect evidence-based information on treatment options. Draft option grids were shared with the wider clinical team for discussion and patients are now being asked for their feedback.

The team’s involvement in the development process has:

  • enabled a team-based understanding of shared decision making
  • increased awareness of the importance of presenting treatment options
  • standardised how treatment options are verbally presented
  • aided the development of tools for local situations
  • given teams a sense of ownership
  • increased discussion about reasonable treatment options and the evidence (or lack of evidence) about likely risks and benefits of options
  • led to further discussion about how shared decision making can be part of a strong professionally oriented multidisciplinary team.

Further reading

Research report

The MAGIC programme: Evaluation

April 2013
Research report

An independent evaluation of the first phase of the MAGIC programme, aimed at encouraging clinical...

You might also like...

Blog

Enabling service transformation in practice: reflections on the Wade-Gery review

Blog

Will the Wade-Gery review enable the NHS to make a leap forwards on tech and data? Tim Horton...

Press release

Inaction on workforce planning will hamper the NHS and social care's ability to recover

Press release

Our response to the vote on the Health and Care Bill amendment on workforce planning.

Press release

Staff vacancies highlight urgent need for NHS workforce strategy and amendment to Health and Care Bill

Press release

Health Foundation response to the RCP Consultant Census 2021 and the proposed amendment to the...

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

Are you a digital marketing or brand professional looking for a new challenge? Help us to grow our audiences for a… https://t.co/xJMBFI0UqD

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more