Unfortunately, your browser is too old to work on this website. Please upgrade your browser
Skip to main content

The value of different aspects of person-centred care: a series of discrete choice experiments in people with long-term conditions

30 August 2018

About 2 mins to read

Title

The value of different aspects of person-centred care: a series of discrete choice experiments in people with long-term conditions

Authors

Christopher Burton, Vikki A Entwistle, Alison M Elliott, Nicolas Krucien, Terry Porteous, Mandy Ryan

Published journal

BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: To measure the value the patients place on different aspects of person-centred care.

Design: We systematically identified four attributes of person-centred care. We then measured their value to 923 people with either chronic pain or chronic lung disease over three discrete choice experiments (DCEs) about services to support self-management. We calculated the value of each attribute for all respondents and identified groups of people with similar preferences using latent class modelling.

Setting: DCEs conducted online via a commercial survey company.

Participants: Adults with either chronic pain (two DCEs, n=517 and 206, respectively) or breathlessness due to chronic respiratory disease (n=200).

Results: Participants were more likely to choose services with higher level person-centred attributes. They most valued services that took account of a person’s current situation likelihood of selection increased by 16.9% (95% CI=15.4 to 18.3) and worked with the person on what they wanted to get from life (15.8%; 14.5 to 17.1). More personally relevant information was valued less than these (12.3%; 11.0 to 13.6). A friendly and personal communicative style was valued least (3.8%; 2.7 to 4.8). Latent class models indicated that a substantial minority of participants valued personally relevant information over the other attributes.

Conclusion: This is the first study to measure the value patients place on different aspects of person-centred care. Professional training needs to emphasise the substance of clinical communication—working responsively with individuals on what matters to them—as well as the style of its delivery.

You might also like...

Citation

BMJ Quality Improvement Programme: Evaluating the quality improvement impact of the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative in four diverse NHS hospitals Brendan A McGrath, James Lynch, Barbarella Bonvento, Sarah Wallace, Val Poole, Ann Farrell, Cristina Diaz, Sadie Khwaja, David W Roberson BMJ Qual Improv Report 2017;6:1 bmjqir.u220636.w7996 doi:10.1136/bmjquality.u220636.w7996
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more