Unfortunately, your browser is too old to work on this website. Please upgrade your browser
Skip to main content
  • Project led by Airedale NHS Foundation Trust.
  • Based within the surgical outpatients and pre-operative assessment clinics at Airedale General Hospital.
  • Aimed to optimise the health of patients in the pre-operative assessment period, conserve blood and improve patient outcomes.
  • The team designed and implemented a blood management programme for patients having hip and knee replacements, with the assessment and optimisation process starting at the point when patients were first listed for surgery.

The team redesigned the pre-surgical assessment and optimisation process to start at the point when patients were first listed for surgery, rather than weeks later as was routine practice. This allowed waiting times to be used to prepare patients for surgery as well as possible. The new treatment protocols included:

  • nurse-led assessment for the majority of patients and quicker access to consultants for patients requiring consultant assessment
  • carrying out blood tests at the primary assessment stage, to maximise the time available for optimising the patient's blood count
  • scheduling pre-operative assessments according to patient needs
  • treating patients requiring intravenous iron immediately with an easy-to-use, low side-effect formulation, rather than booking a separate treatment appointment.

Who was involved

The project was based in the surgical outpatients and pre-operative assessment clinics at Airedale General Hospital and involved surgeons, anaesthetists, haematologists, pharmacists, GPs and the blood transfusion service.

Outcomes

  • Blood transfusion rates decreased from 23% to 7% for hip surgery and from 7% to under 1% for knee surgery.
  • Length of hospital stay fell by just over one day (hip) and two days (knee).
  • Fewer patients were re-admitted within 30 days.
  • Colleagues began referring patients waiting for other surgical procedures to the team, for an opinion and management.
  • Patient experience improved through having to attend fewer appointments.

Challenges

The team faced questions about the cost-effectiveness of the project and the ‘front-loading’ of drug costs, despite the support of the chief executive. They found this frustrating, as one aim of the project was to establish whether optimisation treatments can generate cost savings.

Further reading

About this programme

You might also like...

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more