To evaluate the acceptability to key stake holders of a newly introduced virtual clinic follow-up pathway for hip and knee joint replacement.
A service evaluation comprising a questionnaire sent electronically to 115 patients and interviews with 10 individuals.
A newly introduced virtual clinic follow-up pathway for hip and knee replacement patients in a district general hospital.
The electronic questionnaire was distributed to all patients treated under the virtual clinic service over a 5-month period (n=115). Purposive sampling from volunteers among respondents, leading to semi-structured interviews with eight patients. Two orthopaedic consultants were also interviewed.
Consultant review of web-based patient reported outcome measures and digital radiographs, with feedback to patients via letter, replacing face-to-face outpatient appointments for the follow-up of hip and knee joint replacement.
The response rate to the questionnaire was 40%. 44% indicated they would prefer a virtual appointment over a face-to-face consultation in future. The most common word in the free text comments was ‘good’ (n=107).
Seven main themes were identified from the patient interviews: patient understanding and expectations, patient confidence, patient voice, managing deterioration of condition, patient benefit, patient satisfaction using technology and navigating the website.
Two main themes were identified from the staff interviews: the adapting patient pathway and project management.
Combined analysis elucidated that patients who were doing well liked the ‘click and go’ approach but those with problems were concerned about how to report these and were therefore less satisfied.
The virtual clinic process appears to be well accepted by both patients and clinicians. However, appropriate patient selection and clear pathways of communication to address patient concerns are pivotal to success.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial.
Parkes RJ, Palmer J, Wingham J, et al
Is virtual clinic follow-up of hip and knee joint replacement acceptable to patients and clinicians? A sequential mixed methods evaluation
BMJ Open Quality 2019;8:e000502. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000502
You might also like...
A new £2.1m programme for partnerships developing collaborative communities where people, families, health care professionals...
This three-year project will test and evaluate the scalability of using natural language processing to analyse patient feedba...
Our research shows that most GPs and Practice Managers see quality improvement as a core aspect of their work.
Health Foundation @HealthFdn
'Immigrants should not be blamed for pressures in the NHS. The reasons – unsurprisingly – are far more complex.' O… https://t.co/cdIatpYKQ0Follow us on Twitter
Work with us
We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.View current vacancies
The Q community
Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.Find out more