Practitioners’ dilemmas and strategies in decision-making conversations where patients and companions take divergent positions on a healthcare measure An observational study using conversation analysis

Funded by

The Health Foundation Logo

22 September 2020

Published journal: Health Communication

Abstract

The presence of companions adds complexity to healthcare interactions. Few studies have characterized challenges arising when interactions involve healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients, and companions, or how those challenges are managed. Using conversation analysis, we examined recorded episodes where patients and companions adopt divergent positions on healthcare measures (for example walking aids, homecare, medications). We found nine such episodes within a dataset of 37 palliative care consultations with 37 patients, their companions, and ten healthcare practitioners (HCPs) – doctors, physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Palliative care is one of several healthcare domains where companions substantially contribute to care, consultations, and decision making. We propose that, when patients and companions adopt divergent positions, HCPs face a ‘dilemma of affiliation’ wherein taking a position on the healthcare measure (for example recommending it) entails siding with one party, against the other. By examining what happens in the face of patient-companion divergence, we characterize HCPs’ strategies and substantiate our proposal that these reflect an underlying dilemma. We show that: HCPs do not immediately take a position on the healthcare measure after patient-companion divergence emerges; and when HCPs take a position later in the consultation, they do so without ostensibly siding with the party who previously supported the healthcare measure. Further, once an HCP takes a position, the party who supports the measure can treat the HCP as an ally. We offer insights and propose implications for: palliative care; the interactional complexities of healthcare decision-making; and consultations in which companions participate.

Citation

Marco Pino, Ann Doehring & Ruth Parry (2020) Practitioners’ Dilemmas and Strategies in Decision-making Conversations Where Patients and Companions Take Divergent Positions on a Healthcare Measure: An Observational Study Using Conversation Analysis, Health Communication, DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1813952

You might also like...

Learning report

Improving flow along care pathways

Learning report

Based on a report by RAND Europe and interviews with programme leads during the pandemic, this...

Research project

Understanding and learning from the impact of changes in colorectal cancer care delivery in light of COVID-19 and their interplay with socioeconomic inequalities

Research project

Research to help understand the impact of changes in health service delivery on cancer care during...

Research project

Reshaping secondary care consultations after COVID-19: the role of asynchronous consultation methods

Research project

A research project exploring the roll out of ‘asynchronous’ consultations at scale in NHS Grampian,...

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

RT @Gummifot: I’m excited to share the results from a study I’ve been working on as part of the #ImprovementAnalytics Unit at @HealthFdn. I…

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more