To answer four questions:
- What are attitudes, knowledge and social norms around sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs)?
- What are current levels of trust in messages on SSBs?
- What is current support for, and perceived effectiveness of, the UK soft drinks industry levy (SDIL)?
- What is the association between attitudes, knowledge, social norms, trust, SSB consumption and sociodemographic factors; and support for, and perceived effectiveness of, the SDIL?
Cross-sectional online survey.
UK respondents to the 2017 International Food Policy Study aged 18–64 years who provided information on all variables of interest (n=3104).
Self-reported perceived effectiveness of, and support for, the SDIL.
Most participants supported the SDIL (70%), believed it would be effective (71%), had a positive attitude to SSBs (62%), had knowledge of the link between SSBs and obesity (90%), and trusted messages from health experts (61%), but not those from the food and beverage industry (73%). Nearly half (46%) had negative social norms about drinking SSBs. In adjusted models, older age, non-consumption of SSBs, social norms to not drinks SSBs, knowledge of the link between SSBs and obesity and trust in health expert messages were associated with greater support for the SDIL, whereas having dependent children and trusting messages from the food and beverage industry were associated with less support. In adjusted models, older age was associated with lower perceived effectiveness of the SDIL, whereas social norms to not drink SSBs, negative attitudes to SSBs and trusting messages from health experts and the food and beverage industry were associated with greater perceived effectiveness.
There was strong support for the SDIL and belief that it would be effective. Those with more ‘public health’ orientated norms and trust were generally more likely to support the SDIL or believe that it would be effective.
Pell D, Penney T, Hammond D, et all. Support for, and perceived effectiveness of, the UK soft drinks industry levy among UK adults: cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e026698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026698
You might also like...
Read about the nine expert organisations selected to provide a deep dive into seven key policy areas affecting young people's...
Our response to the Care Quality Commission’s annual assessment of the state of health and social care in England.
Health Foundation response to the Cabinet Office and Department of Health and Social Care Advancing our health: prevention in...
Health Foundation @HealthFdn
Poverty is bad for the nation's health. @JoBibbyTHF blogged about the links between poverty and health earlier in… https://t.co/yM2Mm147KFFollow us on Twitter
Work with us
We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.View current vacancies
The Q Community
Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.Find out more