An increasing number of implementation and improvement frameworks seek to describe and explain how change is made in healthcare. This paper aims to explore how existing frameworks conceptualize the influence of complexity in translating evidence into practice in healthcare.
A database was interrogated using a search strategy to identify publications that present frameworks and models for implementation and improvement.
Ten popular implementation and improvement frameworks were purposively selected.
Comparative analysis was conducted using an analytical framework derived from SHIFT-Evidence, a framework that conceptualizes complexity in implementation and improvement initiatives.
Collectively the frameworks accounted for key concepts of translating evidence in complex systems: understanding the uniqueness of each setting; the interdependency of practices/processes and the need to respond to unpredictable events and emergent learning. The analysis highlighted heterogeneity of the frameworks in their focus on different aspects of complexity. Differences include the extent to which problems and solutions are investigated or assumed; whether endpoints are defined as the uptake of interventions or achievement of goals; and emphasis placed on fixed-term interventions versus continual improvement. None of the individual frameworks reviewed incorporated all the implications of complexity, as described by SHIFT-Evidence.
This research identifies the differences in how implementation and improvement frameworks consider complexity, suggesting that SHIFT-Evidence offers a more comprehensive overview compared with the other frameworks. The similarity of concepts across the frameworks suggests growing consensus in the literature, with SHIFT-Evidence providing a conceptual bridge between the implementation and improvement fields.
Julie Reed, Stuart Green, Cathy Howe. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, mzy158, https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy158
You might also like...
Change in a system as complex as health and care is hard. We'll share fresh insights on this challenge at our annual event.
Darshal Patel reflects on the lessons that behavioural insights offer to health care improvement.
The Health Foundation selects three research projects for programme exploring the use of behavioural insights in health care
The programme supports research that designs, tests and evaluates behavioural interventions that can improve efficiency and r...
Health Foundation @HealthFdn
Data analytics enables new information flows to and from patients and the public. This helps people make better-in… https://t.co/8dO4tZsA6DFollow us on Twitter
Work with us
We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.View current vacancies
The Q Community
Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.Find out more