- Led by University College London Partners, with other partners including Mumsnet and Camden Social Enterprise.
- Based at the antenatal clinic at University College London Hospital (UCLH) and two clinics at Barts Health NHS Trust – at Newham University Hospital and Barking Birth Centre.
- Aimed to create cultural change and system transformation to place the needs and preferences of women at the centre of antenatal care.
- Designed an intelligent internet-based system, co-designed by mums-to-be and health care professionals, that coordinated many aspects of antenatal care.
The team achieved genuine change in the dynamic between health care professionals and mothers-to-be by:
- testing group consultations for the initial ‘booking’ appointment and at 16 weeks
- developing a range of online tools for use by women receiving antenatal care – a Facebook group, the MyPregnancy Journey website and the MumsTalk social network
- engaging participants in project design, through co-design workshops
- incubating the model with three initial sites, using ethnography to help demonstrate to staff the project’s potential
- scaling it up across the region, using established change-management and patient-pull approaches.
- Group appointments have a greater impact at 16 weeks than at the initial booking, where midwives need to communicate a lot of information and women are less likely to interact.
- Moving from individual to group appointments is more efficient, reducing midwife contact time.
- Taking part in 16-week group appointments improved women’s perception of care.
- Well-designed online information and tools can improve women’s experience of care by helping them feel better informed, more prepared and more in control of their pregnancy.
- Collecting data from service users was difficult due to lack of engagement from clinical and administration staff.
- Completed questionnaires revealed high levels of satisfaction with current standards of care and the new intervention, suggesting that the questions were not sensitive enough to measure changes.
- There was strong resistance to change among all levels of staff.
- The project’s focus on measuring changes in relationships did not resonate with managers whose services were evaluated in different ways.
- There was tension between service efficiency and patient outcomes. Service managers were more motivated by efficiency savings, while frontline clinicians were more motivated by meeting women’s needs.
Who was involved?
The project was led by University College London Partners – an academic health science partnership between UCL, UCL Hospitals and NHS trusts in north-central London.
- Mumsnet website
- NHS North Central London Commissioners
- Camden Social Enterprise
- North East, North Central London and Essex Health Innovation Education Cluster
- Innovation Unit
- Tribal Education Ltd
These partners also engaged local user groups, GPs, midwives, obstetricians and commissioners.
About this programme
This programme ran in 2011/13 and offered £400,000 to seven teams working on projects that aimed to...
You might also like...
The Health Foundation has today announced that five partner organisations have joined its Networked...
COVID-19 has led to the rapid roll-out of remote consultations in order to meet social distancing...
New polling data with Ipsos MORI reveal UK public’s awareness of and attitudes towards the planned...
Health Foundation @HealthFdn
Over 700,000 patients served by GPs at high risk of COVID-19 could be left without access to face to face GP appoin… https://t.co/wZJJPCuRCnFollow us on Twitter
Work with us
We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.View current vacancies
The Q community
Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.Find out more