• Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) is an ambitious programme to deliver psychological therapies at scale within England, which began in 2008. As part of a commitment to address the historical under-investment in mental health services, the NHS Long Term Plan included plans to treat 380,000 more patients per year through the IAPT programme. 
  • There is variation in who is affected, for example men in the lowest income households are three times more likely to have a common mental disorder than men in the highest income households. But referrals from patients in deprived areas are less likely to receive a course of treatment than those in wealthier areas.  
  • Building the evidence base of current inequalities is key to ensuring that the push to expand access to mental health care services serves those who most need support. 

IAPT is an ambitious programme to deliver psychological therapies at scale within England, which began in 2008. It is often regarded at the best at-scale roll out of these treatments worldwide. By 2018/19, there were 1,495,680 referrals to IAPT and 38.9% of these completed a course of treatment. 52.1% of treated patients recovered, matching recovery rates demonstrated in the controlled environment of clinical trials — an ambitious goal for the service to have achieved. 

As part of a commitment to address the historical under-investment in mental health services, the NHS Long Term Plan included plans to treat 380,000 more patients per year through the IAPT programme.  

Policies to expand access to treatment should be good news for addressing health inequalities. We examined publically available data to try and understand how the likelihood of receiving treatment following a referral varies by level of deprivation. As the chart shows, currently referrals from patients in deprived areas are less likely to receive a course of treatment than those in wealthier areas. 

Given the health inequalities evident in the publicly available data, we want to do further work to build a more granular picture of how waiting times, symptom severity and treatment delivery mode might affect how patients progress through the pathway, and how this varies between different patient groups.  

Building the evidence base of current inequalities is key to ensuring that the push to expand access to mental health care services serves those who most need support. 

Read the full analysis on Medium

Further reading

Discover

Inequalities

Discover

Everyone in society should have the opportunity to make healthy choices, live healthy lives and...

You might also like...

Chart

Quantifying health inequalities in England

Chart

Quantifying health inequalities is vital to better focus policies designed to address them. This...

Newsletter feature

Let's talk differently about health: why framing matters

Newsletter feature

 Maria Castellina, Director of Impact at FrameWorks UK, explains why framing an issue differently...

Newsletter blog

We can't wait for government to act on health inequalities

Newsletter blog

Political instability has yet again got in the way of public health policy. What is certain is the...

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

Are you passionate about improving care? As our Programme Manager for the #NetworkedData Lab, you'll lead the devel… https://t.co/5OX7Yh4ZyD

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more