Key points

  • The review concludes that greater coordination of care has the potential to reduce costs and should be a major consideration for how to improve quality and save money in the current funding situation.
  • However, while better process coordination could release significant savings, these approaches also have high risks and costs.

This report examines the evidence for the extent to which poor coordination contributes to poor quality outcomes for patients and the approaches to clinical coordination which are shown to improve care and whether these can reduce costs.

Improving coordination is about relationships between people, which is why it is difficult. One of the most important messages from this review is that there are models of care which improve clinical coordination and have been shown to reduce cost but that attempts to replicate these need very careful consideration. By its nature, coordination is dependent upon the local context, so the opportunities and costs will vary in each different healthcare system and in different settings within the system.

The review summarises and grades the strength of the evidence, so that it is clear which approaches are the most robustly evaluated. Some of the evidence is not conclusive, as many changes that aim to improve coordination have not been well evaluated.

The final section of the report suggests how patients, health service providers, commissioners, regulators and professional organisations could all take some responsibility for improving clinical coordination and thus reducing duplication, waste and thus the overall costs of healthcare. 

 

You might also like...

Blog

Improving continuity of care in general practice: four lessons from the frontline

How can general practices balance continuity of care with the need to see a GP promptly? Angus Wiltshire explores four early ...

Briefing

The measurement maze

Our briefing suggests there's potential to make better use of quality measurement to improve quality of care.

Blog

Making time to talk: the challenge of spreading knowledge

Dr Nicola Burgess on the practical value of creating formal spaces to spread informal knowledge within organisations.

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more