- The strategies that have shown most promise in improving patient safety target the key causes of harm in primary care:
- clinical complexity (via computerised prescribing and alert systems)
- human factors (via pharmacist input)
- systems issues (using learning collaboratives, audit and feedback, and discharge planning to improve interfaces with secondary care).
Compared with hospital care, there is relatively little research about improving patient safety in primary care. The evidence that does exist is of variable quality, with a large number of simple observational studies describing strategies implemented at single organisations.
This evidence scan collates empirical evidence that addresses the following questions:
- What initiatives have been implemented to improve safety in primary care and what are the impacts of these initiatives?
- How have patients, professionals, researchers and funders been involved?
- Are there ongoing studies or media stories about this topic?
You might also like...
Dr Matt Willis leads a study exploring the potential for automation in primary care at the University of Oxford. He told us a...
Patients finding it harder to access general practice, but those in poorer areas report greater problems
Health Foundation response to British Social Attitudes Survey on emergency care.
A multidisciplinary analytics action learning set to improve GP appointment systems using discrete event simulation
This project will build analytical capacity in discrete event simulation (DES) in the GP setting, involving a case study site...
Health Foundation @HealthFdn
The decisions we make about technology today will have implications for the entire social care system, says… https://t.co/oCqdxuzZKmFollow us on Twitter
Work with us
We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.View current vacancies
The Q Community
Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.Find out more