A comparison of synthetic control approaches for the evaluation of policy interventions using observational data Evaluating the impact of redesigning urgent and emergency care in Northumberland
Funded by

27 December 2022
Published journal: Health Services Research
Abstract
Objective
To compare the original synthetic control (OSC) method with alternative approaches (Generalised (GSC), Micro (MSC), and Bayesian (BSC) synthetic control methods) and re-evaluate the impact of a significant restructuring of urgent and emergency care in North-East England, which included the opening of the UK's first purpose-built specialist emergency care hospital.
Data sources
Simulations and data from Secondary Uses Service data, a single comprehensive repository for patient-level health care data in England.
Study design
Hospital use of individuals exposed and unexposed to the restructuring is compared. We estimate the impact using OSC, MSC, BSC and GSC applied at the general practice level. We contrast the estimation methods’ performance in a Monte Carlo simulation study.
Data collection/extraction methods
Hospital activity data from Secondary Uses Service for patients aged over 18 years registered at a general practice in England from April 2011 to March 2019.
Principal findings
None of the methods dominated across all simulation scenarios. GSC was generally preferred. In contrast to an earlier evaluation which used OSC, GSC reported a smaller impact of the opening of the hospital on Accident and Emergency (A&E) department (also known as emergency department or casualty) visits and no evidence for any impact on the proportion of A&E patients seen within 4 hours.
Conclusions
The simulation study highlights cases where the considered methods may lead to biased estimates in health policy evaluations. GSC was found to be the most reliable method of those considered. Considering more disaggregated data over a longer time span and applying GSC indicates that the specialist emergency care hospitals in Northumbria had less impact on A&E visits and waiting times than suggested by the original evaluation which applied OSC to more aggregated data.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Work with us
We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.
View current vacanciesThe Q community
Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.
Find out more