Criteria for evaluating programme theory diagrams in quality improvement initiatives A structured method for appraisal

Funded by

The Health Foundation Logo

9 April 2018

Published journal: International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Abstract

Background

Despite criticisms that many quality improvement (QI) initiatives fail due to incomplete programme theory, there is no defined way to evaluate how programme theory has been articulated. The objective of this research was to develop, and assess the usability and reliability of scoring criteria to evaluate programme theory diagrams.

Methods

Criteria development was informed by published literature and QI experts. Inter-rater reliability was tested between two evaluators. About 63 programme theory diagrams (42 driver diagrams and 21 action–effect diagrams) were reviewed to establish whether the criteria could support comparative analysis of different approaches to constructing diagrams.

Results

Components of the scoring criteria include: assessment of overall aim, logical overview, clarity of components, cause–effect relationships, evidence and measurement. Independent reviewers had 78% inter-rater reliability. Scoring enabled direct comparison of different approaches to developing programme theory; action–effect diagrams were found to have had a statistically significant but moderate improvement in programme theory quality over driver diagrams; no significant differences were observed based on the setting in which driver diagrams were developed.

Conclusions

The scoring criteria summarise the necessary components of programme theory that are thought to contribute to successful QI projects. The viability of the scoring criteria for practical application was demonstrated. Future uses include assessment of individual programme theory diagrams and comparison of different approaches (e.g. methodological, teaching or other QI support) to produce programme theory. The criteria can be used as a tool to guide the production of better programme theory diagrams, and also highlights where additional support for QI teams could be needed.

Citation

Laurel Issen, Thomas Woodcock, Christopher McNicholas, Laura Lennox, Julie E Reed; Criteria for evaluating programme theory diagrams in quality improvement initiatives: a structured method for appraisal, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Volume 30, Issue 7, 1 August 2018, Pages 508–513, https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy063

You might also like...

Podcast

After the COVID storm: Where next for the NHS?

Podcast

Episode 3. What is the long-term path for the NHS when the emergency phase of COVID is over? 

Blog

Are multidisciplinary teams an effective tool to reduce emergency hospital activity?

Blog

New analysis from the Improvement Analytics Unit has found that multidisciplinary teams may increase...

Learning report

Improving flow along care pathways

Learning report

Based on a report by RAND Europe and interviews with programme leads during the pandemic, this...

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

RT @Reema__Patel: *****Job Klaxon! ***** New @AdaLovelaceInst Senior Researcher role on Justice and Equalities, which includes working wit…

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more