Practitioner and patient views on the implementation of an automated Computer-Aided Risk Score to predict the risk of death Qualitative study

Funded by

The Health Foundation Logo

23 April 2019

Published journal: BMJ Open

Objectives 

The Computer-Aided Risk Score (CARS) estimates the risk of death following emergency admission to medical wards using routinely collected vital signs and blood test data. Our aim was to elicit the views of healthcare practitioners (staff) and service users and carers (SU/C) on (1) the potential value, unintended consequences and concerns associated with CARS and practitioner views on (2) the issues to consider before embedding CARS into routine practice.

Setting 

This study was conducted in two National Health Service (NHS) hospital trusts in the North of England. Both had in-house information technology (IT) development teams, mature IT infrastructure with electronic National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and were capable of integrating NEWS with blood test results. The study focused on emergency medical and elderly admissions units. There were 60 and 39 acute medical/elderly admissions beds at the two NHS hospital trusts.

Participants 

We conducted eight focus groups with 45 healthcare practitioners and two with 11 SU/Cs in two NHS acute hospitals.

Results 

Staff and SU/Cs recognised the potential of CARS but were clear that the score should not replace or undermine clinical judgments. Staff recognised that CARS could enhance clinical decision-making/judgments and aid communication with patients. They wanted to understand the components of CARS and be reassured about its accuracy but were concerned about the impact on intensive care and blood tests.

Conclusion 

Risk scores are widely used in healthcare, but their development and implementation do not usually involve input from practitioners and SU/Cs. We contributed to the development of CARS by eliciting views of staff and SU/Cs who provided important, often complex, insights to support the development and implementation of CARS to ensure successful implementation in routine clinical practice.

Citation

BMJ Open 2019;9:e026591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026591

You might also like...

Chart

How are total triage and remote consultation changing the use of emergency care?

Chart

New analysis from the Improvement Analytics Unit looks at how shifts to total triage and remote...

Video

Surviving COVID: Behind each statistic lies a human story

Video

In this video, individuals and their families who have directly experienced the severe effects of...

News

Surviving COVID documentary airs on Channel 4

News

When the first surge of the virus hit the UK in March 2020, the Health Foundation decided to...

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

RT @AlexanderBryson: Our new @HealthFdn survey of social #caregivers records the impact #COVID19 has had on their #jobs, livelihoods and th…

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more