Key points

  • Around one in ten people experience harm from hospital care, but the evidence for rates in primary care is sparse.
  • Studies have widely varying estimates of harm, from less than 1% to 24%.
  • The most robust studies suggest that 1–2% of consultations are associated with an adverse event in primary care, with the most common errors relating to medication and communication.
  • In out-of-hours care, the rate is about 2%.
  • The majority of events do not impact significantly on patients.

A great deal of research is available about patient harm in hospital, but less is known about errors in primary care.

This evidence scan collates empirical evidence that addresses the following questions:

  • How is harm measured in primary care?
  • What are the levels of harm in primary care?
  • What are the main causes or sources of harm in primary care?
  • Is there unpublished or ongoing work or media stories about this topic?

You might also like...

Newsletter feature

Three projects that have successfully spread virtual consultations

We shine a spotlight on three of our improvement projects that are playing a key role in rolling out...

Newsletter feature

Using virtual consultations in the fight against COVID-19

We spoke to Professor Greenhalgh about the rapid implementation of virtual consultations in response...

Blog

Building castles on sand: reforming primary care

Rebecca Fisher looks at what the 2019 Commonwealth Fund Survey tells us about primary care reform in...

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more