- Professor McCormick argues that pathway peer review offers a high-quality and complementary addition to the market regulation of the NHS.
- It utilises the benefits of professional insight and self-regulation in what is argued to be a cost-effective way.
Professor Barry McCormick explores a novel approach to improving quality.
At the Health Foundation, the drive to find new ways of doing things that will improve the delivery of healthcare is central to our work. We are interested in solutions that have the potential to make lasting and widespread improvement to health services. Many of these emphasise the importance of internal motivators (for example, professionalism, organisational development and leadership), alongside external ones (for example, regulation, economic incentives and performance management).
Health Foundation thought papers present the authors' own views. We would like to thank Professor McCormick for his work, which we hope will stimulate ideas, reflection and discussion.
A research report, Quality of NHS Care and External Pathway Peer Review, accompanies this paper.
You might also like...
We need to move beyond an exclusive focus on money, to challenge the notion of a ‘magic people tree’, says Anita Charlesworth...
Existing research tells us that international migration is good for the NHS, say Hugh Alderwick and Lucinda Allen
Liberal Democrat pledge would double recent growth in health spending but falls just short of what's needed to modernise the service
Health Foundation response to the Liberal Democrats’ NHS and social care funding pledge.
Health Foundation @HealthFdn
Closing soon: Are you enthusiastic about a career in communications and keen to work in an organisation committed t… https://t.co/D8FY1V0xOkFollow us on Twitter
Work with us
We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.View current vacancies
The Q community
Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.Find out more