This project was funded between September 2015 and November 2019.

  • Run by Frontier Economics.
  • Aimed to explore whether GPs who are involved in training, commissioning and other initiatives achieve better outcomes for patients with long-term conditions, as well as cost savings through fewer unplanned hospital admissions.
  • Measured GP engagement with training, commissioning, new technologies and new drugs, and examined the effect on outcomes for patients with diabetes, dementia and cancer.

This Frontier Economics project examined whether GPs who are involved in training, commissioning and other initiatives achieve better outcomes for patients with long-term conditions, and contribute to reduced secondary care costs. It focused on five aspects of GP ‘activeness’:

  • participation in GP with Special Interest (GPSI) programmes
  • participation in other training
  • prescription of new drugs
  • adoption of new technologies
  • involvement in the management of clinical commissioning groups (CCGs).

The project team collated and analysed data from a range of sources, including secondary care usage data and GP practice prescription data, as well as their own survey of 500 practices.

An in-depth econometric analysis was undertaken, looking at the links between GP activeness and quality of care.

The analysis showed that there are aspects of patient outcomes that, in some conditions, are improved by the engagement of GPs with up-to-date practices, for example in new technology, clinical expertise or prescribing. There are other GP activities – particularly participation in commissioning – which do not appear to consistently improve patient outcomes.

The results revealed that the biggest barrier to improved activeness is GPs’ inability to think strategically about long-term quality improvement due to their clinical workload. Local context also had an impact. For example, GPs working in deprived areas face a considerably higher workload, which could explain why these practices are less likely to engage in some activeness behaviours.

It is possible that the introduction of Primary Care Networks will help address current pressures. However, GPs said that creating these networks requires time, and managing the expanded workforce could reduce the amount of time available for patient-facing activity or for strategic thinking.

Contact details

For more information, contact Nick Fitzpatrick, Frontier Economics.

You might also like...


Level or not?


Our briefing analyses how general practice compares in areas of high and low socioeconomic...


Use of primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic


There have been dramatic shifts in primary care activities and outcomes in response to the COVID-19...


Moving beyond bean counting


This project is aiming to improve analytical capabilities within health visiting, with a focus on...

Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

'This is another stark warning that the government must urgently reform social care if we are to "build back better…

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more