Unfortunately, your browser is too old to work on this website. Please upgrade your browser
Skip to main content
  • 26% of adults aged 18–55 who live in households in persistent poverty rate their health as ‘less than good’ (fair or poor), which is higher than for adults in non-persistent poverty (22%) and not in poverty (16%). 
  • The relative ranking between the three groups shown on the chart has remained constant over time.

Persistent poverty is a particularly important issue for our health, because the experience of prolonged periods of poverty has cumulative effects, for example the build up of chronic stress and impact of life events over time. Research on child poverty found that any exposure to poverty in childhood was associated with worse health, but the effects were more severe for children living in persistent poverty.

The chart shows the proportion of adults aged 55 years and younger in persistent poverty, poverty or not in poverty who report their health as less than good (on a scale of ‘excellent’, ‘very good’, ‘good’, ‘fair’ or ‘poor’).

  • People living in persistent poverty had the worst health of any of the three groups in 2021–22.
  • 26% of adults aged 55 years and younger living in persistent poverty reported less than good health. 
  • This compares with 22% of adults in non-persistent poverty and 16% of adults not in poverty.
  • This ranking was constant over the time period covered: people in persistent poverty reported worse health than people in poverty, and they, in turn, reported worse health than people who were not in poverty.
  • Persistent poverty is defined as an individual living in a household experiencing poverty (a net household income below 60% of the median in that year) for at least three of the past four years.
  • Non-persistent poverty is defined as people living in poverty in the current year of data. 
  • Not in poverty is defined as everyone else who is not in persistent or non-persistent poverty. 
  • Income is adjusted for household size to reflect economies of scale. For example, a household of four people needs more income for the same standard of living as a household of one, but not four times as much.

Source: Health Foundation analysis of University of Essex – Institute for Social and Economic Research, Understanding Society, UK, 2013–14 to 2021–22

Related analysis

Explore the topics

Local authority dashboard
Explore data for your local authority and neighbourhood

Health inequalities

Money and resources
Poverty | Income | Debt

Work
Quality | Unemployment | Security

Housing
Affordability | Quality | Stability | Security

Transport
Active travel | Social exclusion | Trends

Family, friends and community
Personal relationships | Community cohesion

Our surroundings
Pollution | Green space | Safety | Amenities

Coming soon

This is part of Evidence hub: What drives health inequalities?

Data, insights and analysis exploring how the circumstances in which we live shape our health
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101 copy

Get social

Follow us on Twitter
Kjell-bubble-diagramArtboard 101

Work with us

We look for talented and passionate individuals as everyone at the Health Foundation has an important role to play.

View current vacancies
Artboard 101 copy 2

The Q community

Q is an initiative connecting people with improvement expertise across the UK.

Find out more